Coming from a caucus state that voted 75% for Obama (Alaska), I take extreme offense in claiming a majority of so called popular votes, when my state's votes are disregarded in their phony argument for a phony metric.
The dishonesty of ANYONE claiming that Hillary has a lead in popular votes is something I would expect from a neocon Republican.
See, Clinton supporters? In your quest to find anyway to get Clinton a few points in trying to gain the nomination, look at all the bridges you're burning?
But don't you realize he doesn't count because he's from a red caucus state?
Get with the program!
:)
Please, I'm a she from a red state that has a very good chance of going for President Obama this year in the GE
I apologize regarding my mistake on your gender.
As to the rest, it was meant as humor. I sure as hell want us to contest Alaska! There's a Senate seat, I believe, and I know a House seat up (of course).
Obama helps you guys downticket anyway.
You're right, we have a good chance of kicking two crooks out of Congress, Senator Stevens and Congressman Don(the Moron)Young.
Best of luck! But don't be surprised if you don't get many takers to fly up to Alaska in late autumn to go door to door...
Yeah but the poster was from Alaska, his bridge goes to nowhere ;-)
Back in Feb, Move On thought the will of the people ( popular vote ) was important enough to have a petition."The Democratic Party must be democratic. The superdelegates should let the voters decide between Clinton and Obama, then support the people's choice."
http://pol.moveon.org/superdelegates/
Then you agree... Move On are hypocrites.
Agree with what? What the heck are you talking about?
